BECCA Learning Hub
  • Home
  • At a glance
  • Modules
    • 1. What is BECCA?
    • 2. Why BECCA was developed
    • 3. Why best catches?
    • 4. Core principles
    • 5. Wisdom of Crowds
    • 6. Choosing metrics
    • 7. Question structure
    • 8. Survey delivery
    • 9. Calculating indicators
    • 10. Data quality and ethics
    • 11. Data storage
  • Examples
  • Questionnaire
  • Downloads
  • References
  1. References
  • Home
  • BECCA at a glance
  • Learning modules
    • What is BECCA?
    • Why BECCA was developed
    • Why best catches?
    • Core principles of BECCA
    • Wisdom of Crowds: who should be interviewed?
    • Choosing the right catch metric
    • The minimum BECCA question structure
    • Survey delivery options
    • How to calculate BECCA indicators
    • Data quality, validation and ethics
    • Data storage
  • Field tools
    • BECCA questionnaire
    • Downloads
  • Examples
    • Worked examples
  • References

References

1 Jones, B. L. H. et al. New directions for Indigenous and local knowledge research and application in fisheries science: Lessons from a systematic review. Fish and Fisheries 25, 647-671 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12831

2 Dowling, N. A. et al. The FishPath approach for fisheries management in a data- and capacity-limited world. Fish and Fisheries 24, 212-230 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12721

3 Jones, B. et al. Six decades of fishery change inferred from fishers’ recollections of their best catches. (2026). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9115805/v1

4 Saenz-Arroyo, A., Roberts, C. M., Torre, J., Carino-Olvera, M. & Enriquez-Andrade, R. R. Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272, 1957-1962 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3175

5 Sáenz–Arroyo, A., Roberts, C. M., Torre, J. & Cariño-Olvera, M. Using fishers’ anecdotes, naturalists’ observations and grey literature to reassess marine species at risk: the case of the Gulf grouper in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Fish and Fisheries 6, 121-133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2005.00185.x

6 Bender, M. G. et al. Local Ecological Knowledge and Scientific Data Reveal Overexploitation by Multigear Artisanal Fisheries in the Southwestern Atlantic. PLOS ONE 9, e110332 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110332

7 Tesfamichael, D., Pitcher, T. J. & Pauly, D. Assessing changes in fisheries using fishers’ knowledge to generate long time series of catch rates: a case study from the Red Sea. Ecology and Society 19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06151-190118

8 Lavides, M. N. et al. Patterns of Coral-Reef Finfish Species Disappearances Inferred from Fishers’ Knowledge in Global Epicentre of Marine Shorefish Diversity. PLOS ONE 11, e0155752 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155752

9 Leduc, A. O. H. C. et al. Local ecological knowledge to assist conservation status assessments in data poor contexts: a case study with the threatened sharks of the Brazilian Northeast. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 819-845 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02119-5

10 Braga-Pereira, F. et al. Congruence of local ecological knowledge (LEK)-based methods and line-transect surveys in estimating wildlife abundance in tropical forests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13, 743-756 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13773

11 Thurstan, R. H., Buckley, S. M., Ortiz, J. C. & Pandolfi, J. M. Setting the Record Straight: Assessing the Reliability of Retrospective Accounts of Change. Conservation Letters 9, 98-105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12184

12 Surowiecki, J. The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. (Doubleday, 2004).

13 Gray, S. et al. Harnessing the collective intelligence of stakeholders for conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 18, 465-472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2232

14 Jones, B. L. H. et al. Stakeholder diversity matters: employing the wisdom of crowds for data-poor fisheries assessments. Scientific Reports 15, 440 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84970-4

15 Castello, L. et al. Local knowledge reconstructs historical resource use. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 22, e2726 (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2726

16 Grantham, R., Lau, J. & Kleiber, D. Gleaning: beyond the subsistence narrative. Maritime Studies 19, 509-524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-020-00200-3

17 Grantham, R., Álvarez‐Romero, J. G., Mills, D. J., Rojas, C. & Cumming, G. S. Spatiotemporal determinants of seasonal gleaning. People and Nature 3, 376-390 (2021).

18 Rehage, J. S. et al. How has the quality of bonefishing changed over the past 40 years? Using local ecological knowledge to quantitatively inform population declines in the South Florida flats fishery. Environmental Biology of Fishes 102, 285-298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0831-2

  • Edit this page
  • Report an issue